I’m a big fan of federalism because states have the flexibility to choose good policy or bad policy.
And that’s good news for me since I get to write about the consequences.
One of the main lessons we learn (see here, here, here, here, and here) is that high-earning taxpayers tend to migrate from states with onerous tax burdens and they tend to land in places where there is no state income tax (we also learn that welfare recipients move to states with bigger handouts, but that’s an issue for another day).
In this interview with Stuart Varney, we discuss whether this trend of tax-motivated migration is going to accelerate.
I mentioned in the interview that restricting the state and local tax deduction is going to accelerate the flight from high-tax states, which underscores what I wrote earlier this year about that provision of the tax bill being a “big [expletive deleted] deal.”
I suggested that Stuart create a poll on which state will be the first to go bankrupt.
And there’s a lot of data to help people choose.
- Freedom in the 50 States.
- Death Spiral states.
- State spending growth.
- Welfare generosity.
- State tax burden.
- State Business Tax Climate.
- State Fiscal Report Card.
- Bureaucrat pension liabilities.
- Even my Moocher Index.
Technically, I don’t think bankruptcy is even possible since there’s no provision for such a step in federal law.
Daniel J. Mitchell is a top expert on tax reform and supply-side tax policy and is Chairman of the Center for Freedom and Prosperity. Mitchell is a strong advocate of a flat tax and international tax competition.