(CNSNews.com) - "We are a court of law, not policymakers of last resort," Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote, as he and the court's three liberal justices disagreed with the court's other five justices, who said Title 42 should remain in place at the southwest border while the justices review a lower court ruling ending the public health measure.
Title 42 has been used to quickly expel some migrants without a hearing since March 2020, when the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said illegal migration posed a serious danger of introducing a communicable disease.
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court ordered oral arguments in the case to take place in the court's February session, to determine if the states can intervene to block the lower-court ruling lifting Title 42. The order said the court's review focuses only on "the question of intervention," and not on the "merits" of the case, which have not yet been addressed by a federal appeals court.
In his dissent from Tuesday’s order, Gorsuch said the states have come to the Supreme Court, "seeking two things."
First, he said, the states want an expedited review of the lower-court's intervention, which lifted Title 42. And second, the states want Title 42 to remain in place while the Supreme Court reviews the lower court's intervention.
"This stay would effectively require the federal government to continue enforcing the Title 42 orders indefinitely. Today, the Court obliges both requests. Respectfully, I believe these decisions unwise," Gorsuch wrote.
Gorsuch said even if the Supreme Court eventually rules that the states are allowed to intervene, and even if the states show that Title 42 was legally adopted, "the emergency on which those orders were premised has long since lapsed...And it is hardly obvious why we should rush in to review a ruling on a motion to intervene in a case concerning emergency decrees that have outlived their shelf life."
Gorsuch said he doesn't "discount the States’ concerns" about lifting Title 42: "Even the federal government acknowledges 'that the end of the Title 42 orders will likely have disruptive consequences.' But the current border is not a COVID crisis," Gorsuch concluded.
"And courts should not be in the business of perpetuating administrative edicts designed for one emergency only because elected officials have failed to address a different emergency."