Obama Explains Why 4 Americans Weren't Part of Nuke Deal: 'Those Issues Are Not Connected'

By Susan Jones | July 16, 2015 | 5:28 AM EDT

President Barack Obama answers questions at a news conference in the East Room of the White House on Wednesday, July 15, 2015. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

(CNSNews.com) - President Obama bristled on Wednesday when CBS News correspondent Major Garrett asked him why he was "content" to leave four Americans in Iran on "trumped-up charges," instead of making the nuclear deal contingent on their release.

"The notion that I am content as I celebrate with American citizens languishing in Iranian jails, Major -- that's nonsense, and you should know better. I've met with the families of some of those folks. Nobody's content. And our diplomats and our teams are working diligently to try to get them out.

"Now, if the question is why we did not tie the negotiations to their release, think about the logic that that creates. Suddenly, Iran realizes you know what? Maybe we can get additional concessions out of the Americans by holding these individuals. Makes it much more difficult for us to walk away if Iran somehow thinks that a nuclear deal is dependent in some fashion on the nuclear.
 

"And by the way, if we had walked away from the nuclear deal, we'd still be pushing them just as hard to get these folks out. That's why --  But we are working every single day to try to get them out, and won't stop until they're out and rejoined with their families."

The American Center for Law and Justice, an advocate for American pastor Saeed Abedini, says President Obama "should know better" than to leave four Americans behind:

"The reality is, by reaching a final deal with Iran – freeing Iran to pursue a nuclear program while it refuses to free American Pastor Saeed – the President has abandoned him," the ACLJ said.  "What leverage does America have now?  Iran has a nuclear deal and continues to imprison the Americans."

Here's the transcript of the testy exchange between Obama and Major Garrett:

Obama: Major Garrett?

Garrrett: Thank you, Mr. President. As you well know, there are four Americans in Iran, three held on trumped-up charges that, according to your administration, one whereabouts unknown.

Can you tell the country, sir, why you are content, with all the fanfare around this deal, to leave the conscience of this nation, the strength of this nation, unaccounted for in relation to these four Americans?

And last week, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said under no circumstances should there be any relief for Iran in terms of ballistic missiles or conventional weapons. It is perceived that was a last-minute capitulation in these negotiations.
Many in the Pentagon feel you've left the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff high out to dry. Could you comment?

Obama: I've got to give you credit, Major, for how you craft those questions. The notion that I am content as I celebrate with American citizens languishing in Iranian jails, Major, that's nonsense, and you should know better. I've met with the families of some of those folks. Nobody's content. And our diplomats and our teams are working diligently to try to get them out.

Now, if the question is why we did not tie the negotiations to their release, think about the logic that that creates. Suddenly, Iran realizes you know what? Maybe we can get additional concessions out of the Americans by holding these individuals. Makes it much more difficult for us to walk away if Iran somehow thinks that a nuclear deal is dependent in some fashion on the nuclear deal.

And by the way, if we had walked away from the nuclear deal, we'd still be pushing them just as hard to get these folks out. That's why those issues are not connected. But we are working every single day to try to get them out, and won't stop until they're out and rejoined with their families.

With respect to the chairman's testimony, to some degree, I already answered with Carol. We are not taking the pressure off Iran with respect to arms and with respect to ballistic missiles.

As I just explained, not only do we keep in place for five years the arms embargo under this particular new U.N. resolution, not only do we maintain the eight years on the ballistic missiles under this particular U.N. resolution, but we have a host of other multilateral and unilateral authorities that allow us to take action where we see Iran engaged in those activities, whether it's six years from now or 10 years from now.

So we have not lost those legal authorities, and in fact, part of my pitch to the GCC countries, as well as to Prime Minister Netanyahu, is we should do a better job making sure that Iran's not engaged in sending arms to organizations like Hezbollah. And as I just indicated, that means improving our intelligence capacity and our interdiction capacity with our partners.


Please support CNSNews today! [a 501(c)(3) non-profit production of the Media Research Center]

DONATE

Or, book travel through MRC’s Travel Discounts Program! MRC receives a rebate for each booking when you use our special codes.

BOOK NOW