NY Times, Washington Post Pre-Election Iraq War Coverage Down Sharply from 2004, 2006

By Kevin Mooney | October 31, 2008 | 4:57pm EDT

U.S. Army Cpl. Sean Morton, 25, from Boston, Mass., assigned to Killer Troop, 3rd Squadron, 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment, patrols in Mosul, Iraq on Friday, Oct. 24, 2008. (AP Photo/Maya Alleruzzo)

(CNSNews.com) - With control of over two-thirds of Iraq now transferred to local officials and the U.S. military continuing to pressure defeated al Qaeda operatives, a Nexis search shows that The New York Times and The Washington Post have lost interest in a war that appears to have ended in most of Iraq.
Front-page stories and overall coverage in both papers dropped significantly in October 2008 compared to coverage of previous election cycles in 2004 and 2006.
Front-page Headlines Using Word “Iraq”
                                     NYT                W. Post
Oct. 2008                    2                      4
Oct. 2006                    11                    17
Oct. 2004                    17                    27
There were only two front-page New York Times stories that mentioned “Iraq” in the headline in October 2008 – there were 11 in October 2006 and 17 in October 2004.
Put another way, front-page headlines in The New York Times that use the word “Iraq” in the days leading up to an election are down about 88 percent since President Bush was up for re-election in 2004.
The Washington Post ran four front-page stories that had headlines using the word “Iraq” in October 2008 – in October 2006 there were 17 stories, and 27 stories in October 2004. This means front-page headlines in The Post with the word “Iraq” are down 85 percent since the last presidential campaign in 2004.
By any measure, coverage of the Iraq war in the midst of an election is down sharply in both papers from where it was in previous campaign cycles.
Throughout the entire paper, there were 21 stories in The New York Times that mentioned Iraq in the headline in October 2008 versus 70 in October 2006 – a drop of 70 percent. In October 2004 there were 98 such stories, which means coverage has fallen off by 79 percent since that election cycle.
Reporting in both papers began to fall off toward the end of 2007. At that time, U.S. casualties in Iraq were also in decline.
There were 319 New York Times stories that mentioned “Iraq” at least five times in January 2007 when the troop surge began. In October 2008, there were 87 such stories – a drop of about 73 percent. The Washington Post shows a similar trend. There were 283 stories that mentioned “Iraq” at least five times in January 2007 and just 96 for this month – a drop of 66 percent.

An Iraqi policeman drinks water as U.S. Army Cpl. Sean Morton, 25, from Boston, Mass., left, assigned to Killer Troop, 3rd Squadron, 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment, rests during a patrol in Mosul, Iraq on Friday, Oct. 24, 2008. (AP Photo/Maya Alleruzzo)

There have been 13 total U.S. casualties, including seven combat casualties, reported by the U.S. Defense Department as of Oct. 31, which is close to the historical low for the entire war.
Some U.S. officials have suggested the media have consciously turned their attention away from the war now that President Bush’s surge strategy apparently has succeeded.
At a recent event at the conservative Heritage Foundation, Tom Korologos, a former ambassador to Belgium, who served in Iraq in 2003, said: “Perhaps the most telling sign the president’s strategy has worked in recent months is the drastic decline in coverage by the mainstream press.
“News bureaus in Baghdad that were staffed 24/7 at the height of the violence have now been abandoned or are manned by skeleton crews. The embedded media are now at their lowest level in years. It’s getting more difficult every day to see or hear news out of Iraq. There aren’t enough explosions, I guess,” Korologos said.
Vice President Dick Cheney made a similar observation at the National Press Club earlier this year.
“I see, just in general, less reporting, less interest,” he said. “The fact is that people have got other things to worry about. And there have been a lot of other issues to cover. I mean, we're in the middle of a presidential campaign. That's big news. Gasoline prices are $4 a gallon. That's big news. So it doesn't receive as much attention. Good news never does. That's just the way our system works.
“But I do think — I think the surge has been enormously successful,” said Cheney. “And anybody who looks objectively at where we are today in Iraq would have to conclude that we're in far better shape than we were just a couple of years ago.”

CNSNews Reader,

The media are hard at work weaving a web of confusion, misinformation, and conspiracy surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic.

CNSNews covers the stories that the liberal media are afraid to touch. It drives the national debate through real, honest journalism—not by misrepresenting or ignoring the facts.

CNSNews has emerged as the conservative media’s lynchpin for original reporting, investigative reporting, and breaking news. We are part of the only organization purely dedicated to this critical mission and we need your help to fuel this fight.

Donate today to help CNSNews continue to report on topics that the liberal media refuse to touch. $25 a month goes a long way in the fight for a free and fair media.

And now, thanks to the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, you can make up to a $300 gift to the 501(c)(3) non-profit organization of your choice and use it as a tax deduction on your 2020 taxes, even if you take the standard deduction on your returns.

— The CNSNews Team



Sign up for our CNSNews Daily Newsletter to receive the latest news.