London (CNSNews.com) – A coalition of campaigners for women’s rights is vowing to boycott the British government’s first-ever inquiry into the use of shari’a , viewing its terms as inadequate. The inquiry was set in motion earlier this year by Prime Minister Theresa May in her previous capacity as Home Secretary.
The use by some community councils of shari’a (Islamic law) to settle disputes between British Muslims has long been controversial in the United Kingdom.
Two months ago, May said that many British citizens of different faiths follow religious codes and benefit a great deal from their guidance.
But critics charge that the shari’a-run councils victimize minority women by trapping them in abusive marriages, denying them access to civil courts through a shadowy parallel system of family law.
In a television interview this week, May said that it was her determination that there would only be one law in Britain – a point she had also made last May when launching the inquiry.
“For too long politicians in this country refuse to look at the issue of shari’a law and just allow this to continue without any question,” she said. “I've been the politician who’s been willing to say no. I’m concerned that shari’a law is operating in a way that could discriminate against women.”
The official aim of the review, due to be completed next year, is to explore whether using shari’a may be incompatible with the law in England and Wales. It will also examine ways in which it may be misused or exploited.
But in a letter to the Home Office last week, a group of women’s rights organizations, along with dozens of other activists, said they were profoundly disappointed with the terms of reference for the inquiry.
They said the full terms appear to suggest that the goal of the review is to improve the workings of the shari’a councils or “courts,” rather than to fully examine the damage that they have done.
The panel includes a number of lawyer and academics but is also advised by two prominent British imams.
Its chairwoman is Professor Mona Siddiqui, an internationally-known expert in Islamic and Interreligious Studies at the University of Edinburgh.
Because of its composition, the letter signatories wrote that the panel was better suited to a discussion of theology than as one that serves the needs of women.
“It’s going to end up talking about whether one theological viewpoint is better than the other,” Pragna Patel, one of the signatories, said on Thursday.
Patel, the director of Southall Black Sisters, a London-based organization campaigning about violence against women, said evidence has shown that religious tribunals – no matter what faith they represent – are usually discriminatory against women.
She said vulnerable women are not going to want to give evidence in front of imams and that she and other signatories would have preferred a panel led by a judge, as past inquiries in Britain have been.
A second review of shari’a councils was announced by parliament’s Home Affairs Committee last month, and Patel said that her group would be giving evidence to that one.
Maryam Namazie, a spokeswoman for One Law For All, a group that campaigns against the use of Islamic law in Britain, said the British government tended to see all Muslims through the prism of religion.
She said that both the current Conservative government and past Labour ones mistakenly thought that religious leaders automatically had “their ears open” to the voices of the community.
“The reality is that imams’ ears are never open to the issue of women’s rights,” she said.
In a BBC radio interview this month, Siddiqui said she was not involved with shari’a councils and had never worked with them.
She said that the inquiry would not conducted from their perspective but would be aimed at “getting to the very basics of what these councils are doing.”
Siddiqui added that it may be possible she will conclude that these councils should not exist at all.
Still, she argued that all Muslim women should not be lumped together as victims of their own community.
“I think it’s also arrogant to assume that Muslim women don’t have moral agency at all and that when they go to a shari’a council, they are immediately victims,” she said.
Since Theresa May was first appointed as Home Secretary in May 2010, she has often had to deal with controversy over her efforts to fight extremist-inspired terrorism.
In 2013, the Home Office succeeded in deporting radical cleric Abu Qatada from Britain to Jordan after more than a decade’s worth of fighting in the courts. But although the British government had alleged that he had ties to terrorist organizations, a Jordanian court found him not guilty of all charges.
Making headlines more recently, the Investigatory Powers Bill is currently being considered by Parliament. If made law, the measure would allow police and the security services further powers to track people’s use of the Internet, as well bulk collection of computer data and more leeway for warrantless searches.