Commentary

Wisdom Should Prevail Over Panic: Solution to Ebola in U.S. Isn’t Banning Travel

Steven P. Bucci
By Steven P. Bucci | October 7, 2014 | 2:35 PM EDT

The first case of Ebola has hit the United States, resulting in concerns and questions about containing it and going forward, keeping the virus out of the country.

Those who promised Ebola would never reach our shores were being unrealistic.  The disease is now so widespread that a handful of cases spreading internationally is inevitable.

What all citizens should insist on now is that U.S. officials take swift and prompt action to ensure there is no wider outbreak in the U.S.  The best way they can do that is with sound public policies and effective and honest risk communications to our citizens. They can also help stem the spread of the disease in affected regions.

The infected man, Thomas Duncan, was in Liberia when he helped a woman who had symptoms to the hospital. When he left the country he was screened but showed no symptoms. He then entered the U.S. at Dulles International Airport via Brussels.

Reaction to this Ebola case has been swift, an understandable reaction to a frightening malady. Some have made well-intentioned calls to close the borders and seal off any contact with the affected areas.

While seeming to present a quick, effective measure to protect U.S. citizens, this procedure has not worked in the past and is unlikely to do so now. The aim should instead be to deal with cases if they appear in order to fight any wider outbreak.

In past major disease outbreaks, many communities and cities tried to seal themselves off from surrounding areas. The costs were high, and unfortunately they still contracted the diseases. The viruses still managed to affect these communities even though they had supposedly cut off contact with it.

The communities who instead applied their resources (medical, money and people) to limiting the spread within their communities actually fared much better.

Tom Frieden, the director for the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, also believes that sealing off the borders would be a problem. In an interview Friday, he told Fox News:

I wish we could get to zero risk by sealing off the border. But we can’t. The only way we are going to get to zero risk in this country is by controlling it in Africa. Until that happens, Americans may come back with Ebola. Other people who have a right to return or a visa to enter may come back. People will go to third countries and come from there. Sealing them off – first off won’t work. Second off, it will backfire. Because if we can’t get help in there, then we’re not going to be able to stop the outbreak and ultimately we will end up at higher risk, not lower risk.

Closing the borders also presents enormous costs, including the economic loss to the countries.

The key to this is not to focus on a futile fight to keep Ebola out, but to continue the efforts to detect those infected and deal with the individual instances quickly and effectively. In other words, let’s ensure that no instance of an infected individual turns into a larger outbreak.

One possible solution is to add an arrival screening process for travelers from affected areas. This is an intermediate additional safety measure that could catch someone who was not detached at their point of departure. While adding some costs, these would not be huge, and if targeted only to people originating in the affected area would not be an inappropriate hindrance to movement.

RAND notes, “Because of how Ebola is transmitted and the strong health infrastructure and infection control practices in the United States, the likelihood of a major Ebola outbreak is small.” The state of the art medical facilities in the U.S. as well as effective containment practices make is very unlikely that Ebola will spread quickly here.

Ebola presents a major challenge to authorities for managing and protecting U.S. citizens. Sealing off the borders from these countries is not feasible and does not present the best solution for dealing with the virus. America must resist the urge to react out of fear and use wisdom instead. A prudent additional step of increasing screening will help. A panicked overreaction will not.

Steven P. Bucci, who served America for three decades as an Army Special Forces officer and top Pentagon official, is director of the Allison Center for Foreign Policy Studies at The Heritage Foundation.

Editor's Note: This piece was originally published by The Heritage Foundation.


Please support CNSNews today! [a 501(c)(3) non-profit production of the Media Research Center]

DONATE

Or, book travel through MRC’s Travel Discounts Program! MRC receives a rebate for each booking when you use our special codes.

BOOK NOW