White House Mum On Democrat’s Charge of Job Offer In Exchange for Not Running Against Sen. Specter

March 15, 2010 - 6:23 PM

White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs listens to a reporters question, Monday, March 9, 2009, during his daily press briefing in the White House Pressroom at the White House in Washington. (AP Photo/Ron Edmonds)

Washington (CNSNews.com) – White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs claimed again on Friday – after five separate days of questioning on the topic – that he did not have further information about the statement made by Rep. Joe Sestak (D-Pa.) that the White House offered him a high-ranking administration job if he would drop his senate primary challenge against Sen. Arlen Specter (D-Pa.).
 
Gibbs would neither confirm nor deny the charge, as reporters questioned him on seven separate times about the matter over the five days, starting first on Feb. 23.
 
Concerning the issue, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), the ranking member of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, sent a letter to White House Counsel Robert Bauer asking for more information. Issa asserted in the letter that, if Sestak’s story is true, it would amount to a criminal act.
 
Meanwhile, Specter, a former prosecutor and former chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said on MSNBC that if Sestak’s claim is true, it would be illegal under the bribery statue. He called for Sestak to name names and name dates about his allegation.
 
Sestak, meanwhile, has stuck to his claim on several occasions but has not offered additional information.
 
Below, according to the White House transcripts, are the various responses Gibbs has given to reporters when asked about Sestak’s allegation.
 
 
February 23, 2010
 
Question: “One last thing, I'm sorry. Congressman Jeff Sestak last week said that the White House offered him a high-ranking job in the administration to not run against Arlen Specter. Do you guys have any comment on that?”
 
Gibbs: “I was traveling for a couple of days, as you know. I have seen some stuff that he said, but I have not looked into this.”
 
Later in that same Feb. 23 briefing:
 
Question: “I want to follow-up on Jake's (ABC News) question, because on Friday, unnamed officials of this building did vociferously deny Representative Sestak's assessment that he had been offered a job. And I just want to say, when you said, ‘I haven't looked at this,’ I want to make sure you're not contradicting that denial.”
 
Gibbs: “I just -- because I was on the road and dealing with different things on the road, I've not had a chance to delve into this.”
 
Question: “Would there be anything inappropriate about a discussion like that?”
 
Gibbs: “Let me have somebody look into -- like I said, I was on the road and I don't really have a whole lot of knowledge on this.”
 
 
March 1, 2010
 
Question: “Thank you, Robert. Last Monday you were asked twice about the claims of Congressman Sestak that he had been offered a high-ranking administration position and ….”
 
Gibbs: “I have not -- I have not made any progress on that.”
 
Question: “Just to let you know, I was in touch with Geoff Morrell from the Pentagon, who said there was no discussion of it at all. But Mr. Sestak's spokesman, Jonathan Dworkin, said the congressman stands by his story. Can you check if the White House --?”
 
(crosstalk)
 
Gibbs: “I was remiss on this, and I apologize.”
 
(crosstalk)
 
Gibbs: “I -- there's not much to follow up on. Let me, let me check into that.”
 
Later in the same briefing…..
 
Question: “(inaudible) back on it just very briefly. An unknown White House spokesperson did say in the Philadelphia Inquirer, or did deny what Sestak had said three times on TV?”
 
Gibbs: “Yes, I said I would check on this. It's hard for me to do followups on something I can't -- can't work through.”
 
Question: “So, so at this point, the White House is not ready to deny what Sestak said?”
 
Gibbs: “No. I, I think I said I would check on, on the situation.”
 
 
March 9, 2010
 
Question: “A couple of quick political ones. On the Sestak issue, Arlen Specter said on another -- this afternoon that Sestak and his opinion on this allegation that he was offered a job not to run against Specter, needs to prove it, needs to back it up, and claims that Sestak's accusation is hurting the White House, damaging its reputation. You told us a couple of times you'd check back on this. Can you give us an update, number one? And number two – ”
 
Gibbs: “I don't have the update with me, but let me check and see if I do have anything --”
 
Question: “Do you have any evaluation of Senator Specter's comments on this?”
 
Gibbs: “No, I don't.”
 
 
March 11, 2010
 
Question: “One other thing, because last Tuesday you told us, ‘I don't have the update with me on Sestak.’ Two things have happened since then. Two things have happened.”
 
Gibbs: “I don't have any – ”
 
Question: “Darrell Issa sent a letter to the White House Counsel – ”
 
Gibbs: “I don't have anything additional on that. Scott?”
 
Question: “Are you ever going to have anything additional on that?”
 
Gibbs: “I don't have it today.”
 
 
March 12, 2010
 
Question: “And the other thing:  Do you have an answer yet on Mr. Sestak’s charge?”
 
Gibbs: “I don’t have any more information on that.”