'Memogate' scandal reveals Pakistani splits

By CHRIS BRUMMITT | November 18, 2011 | 6:05 AM EST

FILE - In this July 19, 2010 file photo Pakistani ambassador in Washington Husain Haqqani, left, talks with Richard Holbrooke, former U. S. Special representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan, in Islamabad, Pakistan. Pakistan says it has not decided whether to accept a resignation offer from its ambassador to the U.S. over a reported attempt to enlist Washington's help to rein in the country's military after the raid that killed Osama bin Laden in June. (AP Photo/B.K. Bangash, file)

ISLAMABAD (AP) — Publication of a secret memo asking Washington for help reining in the Pakistani military further ignited a scandal Friday threatening Pakistan's U.S. ambassador and exposing the rift between its shaky government and the country's powerful generals.

The ambassador, Husain Haqqani, has denied having anything to do with a memo delivered to the U.S. military chief asking for help with the military because of the domestic turmoil triggered by the U.S. raid that killed al-Qaida founder Osama bin Laden.

The "memogate" scandal is adding to pressures on the already deeply unpopular government. Some analysts have speculated that President Asif Ali Zardari himself could be in danger if charges that he signed off on the memo gain traction.

"The target is not me, the target is President Zardari and Pakistani democracy," Haqqani said.

Though Pakistan has a civilian president, the military retains vast political and economic power. It has ruled Pakistan, directly or indirectly, for most of its six-decade existence, and fiercely resisted attempts by civilian leaders to curb its role.

Haqqani is alleged to have written a memo to Adm. Mike Mullen, the top U.S. military officer at the time, asking for his assistance in installing a "new security team" in Islamabad that would be friendly to Washington.

A Pakistani English-language newspaper, The News, and Foreign Policy's website on Friday published the text of the memo. After initially denying any knowledge of the document, Mullen's spokesman confirmed he received it but ignored it because it was not credible.

Haqqani insists he had nothing to do with the memo. If authentic, it would reinforce politically toxic charges that the government is colluding with the United States against the interests of the country and its army. Though Washington pumps huge amounts of aid into the country, the U.S. is highly unpopular there.

The memo promises to allow the U.S. to propose names of officials to investigate bin Laden's presence in Pakistan, facilitate American attempts to target militants like al-Qaida leader Ayman al-Zawahri and Taliban chief Mullah Omar and allow it greater oversight on Pakistan's nuclear weapons.

The affair has been whipped up by critics of the government and those close to the military. Haqqani has offered to resign over the affair, and Zardari could become a target if claims that he approved the memo prove credible.

Some say Zardari will have no choice but to dismiss Haqqani, a close ally. Zardari's spokesman said Thursday that the government had not decided what action, if any, to take against the envoy, who has been summoned to Islamabad to explain the scandal.

The News also printed what it said were transcripts of Blackberry messenger conversations between Haqqani and Mansoor Ijaz, a U.S. citizen of Pakistani origin who claims to have delivered the memo to Mullen via an intermediary, on the orders of Haqqani.

The conversations show Haqqani allegedly discussing the wording of the memo with Ijaz and telling him to go ahead.

"Ball is in play now. Make sure you have protected your flanks," Ijaz allegedly tells Haqqani after handing over the memo.

The memo also accuses Pakistan army chief Gen. Ashfaq Pervez Kayani of plotting to bring down the government in the aftermath of the bin Laden assassination, which led to intense and highly unusual domestic criticism of the army. It asks Mullen for his "direct intervention" with Kayani to stop this.

Some analysts have questioned the logic of this, suggesting the affair is a conspiracy cooked up by the military to embarrass the government or remove Haqqani.

"Could Haqqani/Zardari be that staggeringly out of touch with reality," wrote Cyril Almeida, a political commentator, in Dawn newspaper. "The more likely, though far from certain scenario? The boys (the army establishment) are up to their tricks again."

Ijaz initially broke the news of the scandal himself in an Oct. 10 column in the Financial Times, adding to the general murkiness surrounding the affair. He claimed in an interview with Dawn that he wrote the column to defend Mullen's criticism of Pakistan's alleged support for Islamist militants and mentioned the memo to strengthen his argument.

Ijaz has a history of making claims to be well connected with U.S. politicians. Under the Clinton administration, he said U.S. officials told him Sudan was willing to turn over then-fugitive bin Laden, who was taking refuge there. Ijaz said Clinton National Security Adviser Sandy Berger rejected the deal because he was unwilling to do business with Sudan — a claim that Berger immediately denied.

Ansar Abbasi, a newspaper editor often said to be a proxy for the military establishment, said if Haqqani is involved in the affair, he should be tried for treason.

Haqqani is a key conduit between two countries that mistrust each other but need each other. Because the United States and the Zardari government are so unpopular in Pakistan, he attracts flack from all directions. His supporters say he has performed his job well, battling for Pakistan's interest during several crises.

"If Haqqani does leave his post, we will have lost our most effective lobbyist for the country," said The Express Tribune newspaper in an editorial.